Page 40 - ITU Kaleidoscope 2016

2016 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference

these amongst themselves. [3] Frans Berkhout and Julia Hertin, “Impacts of informa-
tion and communication technologies on environmental
sustainability: Speculations and evidence,” Report to
6. CONCLUSION the OECD, Brighton, vol. 21, 2001.
The work described in this study addresses the issue of mak- [4] Andreas K¨ ohler and Lorenz Erdmann, “Expected envir-
ing Green ICT more practical for organisations. Often or- onmental impacts of pervasive computing,” Human and
ganisations know they need to make their data center more Ecological Risk Assessment, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 831–
energy efficient by turning up the heat or thinking carefully 852, 2004.
about how they cool their equipment but they do not look
[5] Alemayehu Molla, Vanessa Cooper, and S. Pittay-
beyond the data center. For Green ICT to be truly effective,
achawan, “It and eco-sustainability: Developing and
organisations need to know how they can both reduce the en-
validating a green it readiness model.,” in ICIS 2009
vironmental footprint of their ICT equipment as well as how
to use their ICT equipment to help reduce the footprint of Proceedings, 2009.
their other business activities. [6] E. Gelenbe and Y. Caseau, “The impact of information
The SURF Green ICT Maturity Model is designed to address technology on energy consumption and carbon emis-
exactly this issue. It helps organisations to identify areas for sions.,” Ubiquity, vol. 1, 2015.
improvement in an efficient way. We illustrated this through
[7] Balakrishnan Ramesh Babu, Anand Kuber Parande,
a field study that followed four organisations who used to
and Chiya Ahmed Basha, “Electrical and electronic
maturity model to gain insight in where they stand as well as
waste: a global environmental problem,” Waste Man-
to get inspired to take action. By using the model not only to
agement & Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 307–318, 2007.
get an overall impression of the maturity model Green ICT,
but also to discuss the results with participants in an evalu-
[8] Ecofys, Quantis, and BIO Intelligence Service, “Ict
ation session, the value of the maturity model was clear to the
footprint: Pilot testing on methodologies for energy
participants. Both individuals and organisations as a whole, consumption and carbon footprint of the ict-sector,”
were very positive on the use of the maturity model. It in-
2013.
creased awareness, inspired to take action and was insight-
ful. A model such as the SGIMM can be used to benchmark [9] Gartner, “Introducing the gartner green and sustainable
amongst organisations, and become a standard way of meas- it infrastructure and operations maturity model,” 2013.
uring and addressing Green ICT.
[10] Alemayehu Molla and Vanessa Cooper, “Green it read-
Even though the results described here are limited to four iness a framework and preliminary proof of concept,”
organisations and we should be careful to draw general con-
Australasian journal of information systems, vol. 16,
clusions, the strong positive reception indicates the potential
no. 2, 2010.
such a model can have for organisations to guide them in us-
ing Green ICT. Moreover, the participants were stimulated to [11] UK HM Government, “Uk hm government green ict
consider actions to reduce the environmental impact of ICT maturity model,” 2013.
as well as use it to enable improvements in other business
areas. [12] S deMonsabert, Khuloud Odeh, and Jenny Meszaros,
“Sustainabits: A framework and rating system for sus-
For future work, we will consider following the participating
tainable it,” in Green Computing Conference (IGCC),
organisations over a longer period of time to see if they actu-
ally follow-up on the results of their maturity scan. It would 2012 International. IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–9.
be interesting to see whether they would write an action plan [13] Brian Donnellan, Charles Sheridan, and Edward Curry,
and carry out improvement actions. After a year or so, the “A capability maturity framework for sustainable in-
organisation can then repeat the maturity scan to see where formation and communication technology,” IT profes-
they stand compared to the year before. Such a comparison sional, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2011.
would give insight in whether the use of the model is actually
effective in improving the maturity and therefore the green- [14] Albert Hankel, “Surf green ict maturity model,” 2015.
ness of an organisation.
[15] Mark C Paulk, Bill Curtis, Mary B Chrissis, and
Charles V Weber, “Capability maturity model, version
REFERENCES 1.1,” Software, IEEE, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 18–27, 1993.

[16] Albert Hankel, Lisa Oud, Maiko Saan, Patricia Lago,
[1] S. Murugesan, “Harnessing green IT: Principles and
et al., “A maturity model for green ict: The case of the
practices,” IT Professional, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 24–33,
surf green ict maturity model.,” in EnviroInfo, 2014,
Jan 2008.
pp. 33–40.
[2] “#SMARTer2030, ICT Solutions for 21st Century
Challenges,” 2015.

– 22 –