The Messaging,
Malware and Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group (M3AAWG) is a global
nonprofit association founded to develop effective models to combat online
threats such as spam, botnets, phishing, malware and denial-of-service attacks
that can cause great harm to individuals, organizations and national
economies. Representing more than one
billion mailboxes, M3AAWG is the largest global organization
developing cross-sector approaches to protecting users and network
infrastructure.
Our members
include technical experts, researchers and policy specialists from a broad base
of network operators and from key technology providers, academia, government
and volume messaging sender organizations. The multidisciplinary approach at M3AAWG
(www.m3aawg.org) includes the development of industry best practices,
education, technical statements on public policy and legislation, and the
facilitation of global collaboration.
We appreciate
the opportunity to respond to the request from the ITU Council Working Group on
International Internet–Related Public Policy Issues (CWG–Internet) for online
consultations from all stakeholders. We
will be focusing our remarks on the first issue:
- Issue 1: Consultation on
effectively countering and combatting spam
The Council Working Group on International Internet-Related Public Policy
Issues invites all stakeholders to provide input on international public
policy issues related to effectively countering and combatting spam.
While
this topic is somewhat broad, we welcome the invitation to share our global
experience in reducing spam levels and to explain the strategies that have
proven most effective in almost ten years of working together against Internet abuse.
M3AAWG was
formed as a working body in 2004 to fight spam and its associated problems at a
time when email, one of the Internet’s two “killer apps,” was at risk of
collapse.
In tackling the
issue over the years, we have realized that despite the astoundingly higher
volumes of spam today, our members have been able to prevent all but a
relatively small percentage of this abusive email from being delivered to
users’ inboxes. This is documented in
our quarterly M3AAWG Email Metrics Reports[i]
with data collected directly from global network operators aggregating the
quantity of abusive mail identified and the percentage delivered to
end-users. Email continues to thrive in
a managed state of health in much of the world.
What
has worked? The most powerful tools we
have identified for expunging increasing volumes of spam from both established
and growing networks has been 1) the widespread adoption of proven best
practices based on shared industry expertise and 2) industry collaboration in
an environment of mutual trust and open dialogue.
With
this historical assessment, we respectfully submit to the ITU Council Working
Group-Internet that there is an active and multi-stakeholder community, which
has, collectively, been engaged on this issue for more than a decade. M3AAWG,
especially, is widely recognized as the forum of choice for cooperation in a
vendor-neutral, collegial and vetted environment on the technical issues
necessary to protect service providers and end users.
However, M3AAWG
fully realizes that Internet service providers in emerging economies continue
to face significant problems with Internet abuse, and so works to extend the
best practices developed by its members to industry entities around the world
by:
- Making translations of many M3AAWG
best practice documents available in multiple languages, including all the
official languages of the United Nations
- Organizing and participating in
outreach initiatives
- Actively engaging with other relevant stakeholders
around the world, across governments, industry and civil society
M3AAWG
looks forward to working closely with the ITU to promote the voluntary adoption
of existing and future best practices and to encourage global cooperation on
capacity building in emerging Internet economies.
To
this end, M3AAWG has worked over the years to foster a respected,
vetted community for dialogue and information sharing – and has created the necessary
meetings and infrastructure – allowing our members to privately share their experiences
with effective anti-spam strategies and then distribute this distilled
knowledge to the industry as best practices. We also have successfully
partnered with other inter-governmental, industry and civil society organizations
to bring specialized talents and resources to more effectively address rapidly
morphing threats.
For example, M3AAWG
collaborated with the London Action Plan (LAP) last year in producing the “Best
Practices to Address Online and Mobile Threats[ii],”
a comprehensive 52-page report outlining proven tactics against abuse. LAP is a highly respected network of
organizations engaged in anti-spam and law enforcement; M3AAWG
shared its technical competency, collaborative knowledge and real-world
experience. The resulting jointly
authored report has been submitted to the OECD for consideration and
implementation by both business and government entities. It contains the collective knowledge of
experts from around the world on how to reduce online risks, augmented with
forward-thinking recommendations to tackle emerging vulnerabilities, such as
mobile text spam and Web abuse.
As
spammers grow more sophisticated and emboldened, it has become increasingly
difficult for an isolated and politicized world to keep pace with evolving
threats. As stated in the M3AAWG/LAP
report,
“. . . Spam is not just an email
phenomenon. It continues to expand into various forms of new media. For
example, mobile messaging and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) spam are now
extremely common, as are spam comments on social media, blogs and other
websites…”[iii] In confronting the
complex malady of today’s spammers, the technical specialists working with
these issues every day have come to depend on the vetted channels available
through industry associations to share their discoveries with the world in
reports such as this one.
This approach is adaptable to the needs of both specific countries and
network environments. Industry best
practices and information sharing programs support anti-abuse efforts in both
large and small companies, and in countries with both established and developing
Internet infrastructure. M3AAWG,
like other industry associations, has engaged in numerous outreach programs
that have also contributed to curtailing spam, including:
·
Our port 25 management best practices have been widely
adopted as an effective anti-spam strategy. M3AAWG also issued the
first best practices to help ISPs work with customers to mitigate bots and
malware, which became the basis of the IETF’s RFC 6561.
·
Among the 25 best practices we have issued, M3AAWG
published the first senders best practices developed through the cooperative
efforts of network operators and volume email senders, and the M3AAWG
position against email appending has received wide industry support.
·
We have responded to 27 requests for comments outlining how
the technical aspects of public policy would affect the industry’s ability to
identify and curtail spam, including responses to ICANN and other Internet
governing bodies, and to both North American and European public policy
agencies.
·
We continue to partner with other organizations, including working
with the OECD to produce its initial anti-spam tool kit. While serving as M3AAWG
co-chairman, Michael O’Reirdan chaired the U.S. FCC CSRIC committee that
produced the first voluntary code outlining how network operators can work
against bots and malware, the Anti-Bot Code of Conduct for ISPs[iv]
(ABCs for ISPs). The CSRIC committee also involved other M3AAWG
members.
International cooperation
is essential to stopping abusive messaging.
Industry associations like M3AAWG provide a proven and vetted
environment for the necessarily sensitive dialogue among global competitors and
law enforcement.
·
In India, M3AAWG offered an anti-spam workshop
at the request of the EastWest Institute (EWI) attended by influential industry
representatives and we continue to host two additional meetings a year to facilitate
Indian industry cooperation against spam. Information and related documents for
the India Anti-Abuse Working Group are available at www.m3aawg.org/india.
·
The East West Institute selected M3AAWG to
announce the first collaborative anti-spam effort between industry stakeholders
in China and the United States, and M3AAWG has taken on the task of
continuing that work.
·
We often host other organizations such as the LAP and the
GSMA Security Group at our meetings. M3AAWG
meetings bring together 300 to 400 leading security professionals for confidential
dialogue three times a year, including an annual European meeting. The meetings offer more than 30 training, educational
and dialogue sessions and keynotes have included FTC Bureau of Consumer
Protection Director David Vladeck, INTERPOL’s Assistant Director Michael Moran,
U.S. ITU Ambassador Phil Verveer, European Commission Justice Freedom and
Security DG Radomir Jansky, DNS creator Paul Mockapetris, and officials from
ICANN, IETF and Industry Canada, among others.
·
We have produced pertinent training videos with recognized
experts detailing malware
mitigation techniques, anti-spam protocols and other anti-abuse tactics that
are available to the general industry.
·
We issue the only email metrics reports generated with anonymized and aggregated data
sourced directly from network operators and are currently developing the first
operators’ bot metrics report.
·
Many concerned government entities are members and
participant in M3AAWG dialogues, including the U.S. Senate’s IT
department, and other organizations such as CAUCE; eco, an association of
German ISPs; ISC (Internet Systems Consortium); International Computer Science
Institute (ICSI); .SE, the Internet Infrastructure Foundation; the Internet
Society (ISOC); NCTA (National Cable & Telecommunications Association);
Spamhaus; Shadowserver; and SURBL.
These and other
efforts by various industry associations are considered by many security
experts, public policy advisors and government entities to be among the most
efficient programs for confronting spam and abuse.
We encourage
the CWG-Internet to focus on promoting the voluntary adoption of existing best
practices developed by impartial industry associations that represent the best
thinking of experienced technical experts. Promoting and supporting industry
best practices developed by experts is the best use of resources versus working
to create new procedures and incurring the time delays associated with
replicating existing work.
Speaking for M3AAWG,
you can find all our best practices, training videos and other materials on our
website at www.m3aawg.org. I will be
glad to respond to any questions or provide more information. You can also address any inquiries about our
work at M3AAWG to me, M3AAWG Executive Director Jerry
Upton at jerry.upton@m3aawg.org.
Sincerely,
Jerry
Upton, M3AAWG Executive Director
Jerry.Upton@m3aawg.org
[i] Email
Metrics Program: The Network Operators’ Perspective with reporting beginning in
April 2007. Reports are available at http://www.m3aawg.org/email_metrics_report
[ii] “Best Practices to Address Online and
Mobile Threats,” Messaging, Malware and Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group (M3AAWG)
and London Acton Plan (LAP), October 2012, http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/M3AAWG_LAP_Best_Practices_to_Address_Online_and_Mobile_Threats_0.pdf
[iv] Final Report: The Anti-Bot Code of Conduct for Internet Service Providers (A Voluntary Code), The Communications
Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council Working Group 7, available
at http://www.maawg.org/abcs-for-ISP-code.
|