| Author |
 Proposed Indicators on QoS  |
|
|
alhashmi
Active Member
Oman
Member since
26 Sep 2011
Last visit
01 Feb 2023
38 Posts |
 Posted - 02 Dec 2020 : 05:43:09
|
Dear EGTI Team,
I have added one slide proposal to the QoS document for the proposed criteria to be studied and commented from your experience in order to develop it in a proper way standardize for collection and reporting by all the countries. appreciate your feedback at your earliest so we can finalize the document before the end of this year.
Regards,
Fatma
|
Fatma AL Hashmi
TRA of Oman |
 |
|
|
alhashmi
Active Member
Oman
Member since
26 Sep 2011
Last visit
01 Feb 2023
38 Posts |
|
Posted - 02 Dec 2020 : 05:35:23
|
thanks dear Giannis, for the comments agree with you that we have to agree at higher level of EGTI and study group on the criteria of the measurements and standardize it as possible. I'm proposing one slide on the is regard in the document of the study and appreciate your feedback and recommendations.
Regards,
Fatma
quote:
Originally posted by jtsiamis
Dear all,
I am posting the following comments and files on behalf of Mrs Stavroula Bouzouki (SBouzouki@EETT.GR), a colleague in the Greek telecom regulator (EETT) with extensive experience on QoS.
�Because the results of this ITU report in a way compere the countries, the guidelines and the definition should be to ensure transparency and the best practice related with the corresponding topic.
1. The most important QoS parameters for the most popular data services are not only the delay variation but also packet loss
2. The measurement methodology paragraph is not sufficiently substantiated to ensure that the procedure is harmonized as much as possible by the Member States implementing it.
3. It would be right to have references to recommendations of the ITU or other international organizations that should be taken into account in the implementation of both the measurement scenarios and their elaboration.
4. The proposed procedure doesn�t refer any rule about the aggregation of the data
5. The proposed procedure does not ensure the use of the same statistical rules so that the results can be retrieved at country level
The above comments are intended to record as accurately as possible the state of the Member States' communication networks in accordance with scientific criteria.
It is suggested that the lack of this information in the existing texts should be covered with the cooperation with the SG12 ITU-T�
Thank you
Giannis Tsiamis
|
Fatma AL Hashmi
TRA of Oman |
|
|
|
jtsiamis
Active Member
Greece
Member since
08 Jun 2015
Last visit
18 Jul 2022
14 Posts |
|
Posted - 02 Oct 2020 : 16:54:45
|
Dear all,
I am posting the following comments and files on behalf of Mrs Stavroula Bouzouki (SBouzouki@EETT.GR), a colleague in the Greek telecom regulator (EETT) with extensive experience on QoS.
�Because the results of this ITU report in a way compere the countries, the guidelines and the definition should be to ensure transparency and the best practice related with the corresponding topic.
1. The most important QoS parameters for the most popular data services are not only the delay variation but also packet loss
2. The measurement methodology paragraph is not sufficiently substantiated to ensure that the procedure is harmonized as much as possible by the Member States implementing it.
3. It would be right to have references to recommendations of the ITU or other international organizations that should be taken into account in the implementation of both the measurement scenarios and their elaboration.
4. The proposed procedure doesn�t refer any rule about the aggregation of the data
5. The proposed procedure does not ensure the use of the same statistical rules so that the results can be retrieved at country level
The above comments are intended to record as accurately as possible the state of the Member States' communication networks in accordance with scientific criteria.
It is suggested that the lack of this information in the existing texts should be covered with the cooperation with the SG12 ITU-T�
Thank you
Giannis Tsiamis
|
|
|
|
bandusiri
Really Active Member
Sri Lanka
Member since
20 May 2009
Last visit
20 Dec 2024
94 Posts |
Posted - 21 Aug 2020 : 08:02:26
|
Dear All,
Thanks for the reminder
A S W Bandusiri Silva
Sri Lanka |
|
|
|
alhashmi
Active Member
Oman
Member since
26 Sep 2011
Last visit
01 Feb 2023
38 Posts |
|
Posted - 20 Aug 2020 : 07:38:14
|
Dear EGTI Members,
As per the recommendation of EGTI 2019 to extend the work of the QoS sub-group indicators, we would like to share with you the draft document of the 2020 new indicators that have been proposed and drafted by the group members. We highly appreciate to share with us your comments and feedback (if any) at your earliest please which might enrich the document for September 2020 meeting.
Regards,
QoS sub-group Rapporteur
|
Fatma AL Hashmi
TRA of Oman |
|
| |
Proposed Indicators on QoS |
|
Proposed Indicators on QoS
