Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR)
�1����
Introduction
�2����
Guidelines
�3����
Overview of the methodologies
Annex 1� Relationship between the I/N criterion, the C/N
degradation and the� corresponding interfering field strength
������ A1.1����
Received noise power and equivalent noise field strength
����������������� A1.1.1����
Thermal noise power and equivalent noise field strength
����������������� A1.1.2����
Environmental noise power and equivalent noise field strength
������������� ����A1.1.3����
Total receiver noise power and equivalent noise field strength
������ A1.2����
Equivalent noise field strength and minimum median field strength for
planning
������ A1.3����
Field strength threshold related to I/N
������ A1.4����
Individual median effective interfering field strength
������ A1.5����
Multiple median effective interfering field strengths corresponding to I/N
and equivalent C/N degradation
����������������� A1.5.1����
Threshold based on median effective field strength
��������� ��������A1.5.2����
Statistical considerations for threshold based on median effective field
strength
����������������� A1.5.3����
Threshold based on C/N degradation
Appendix 1 to Annex 1� Examples of field strength threshold calculation
and C/N degradation for the case of DTTB fixed reception
Appendix 2 to Annex 1� Relationship between co-channel field strength
and adjacent-channel field strength
Appendix 3 to Annex 1� Example of co-channel interference assessment
threshold� for co-primary frequency allocations
Appendix 4 to Annex 1� Example of adjacent channel field strength interference
assessment thresholds for co-primary frequency allocations
Appendix 5 to Annex 1� Method to assess co-channel and multiple-adjacent
channel interference into the broadcasting service from all radiations and
emissions without a corresponding frequency allocation in the bands allocated
to broadcasting
�1����
Co-channel assessment threshold for the broadcasting service
�2����
An example of adjacent and multiple-adjacent channel interference
assessment thresholds from all radiations and emissions without a corresponding
frequency allocation in the bands allocated to the broadcasting service
Annex 2� Methodology for assessing degradation
in DTTB reception location probability from interfering stations of other
services/applications
������ A2.1����
Introduction
������ A2.2����
Methodology
������ A2.3����
Parameters
������ A2.4����
Nuisance fields and power summation
������ A2.5����
Monte Carlo simulation
������ A2.6����
Conclusion
Appendix 1 to Annex 2
�1����
Introduction
�2����
Relationship between I/N and degradation of the reception
location probability
�3����
Summary
Appendix 2 to Annex 2� Example
Monte Carlo simulation with calculation saving methods