Question 22/2 – Guidelines on the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) – Utilization of ICT for disaster management, resources, and active and passive space-based sensing systems as they apply to disaster and emergency relief situations
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction
1.1 Structure of this guidelines document
2 The Common Alerting Protocol content standard
2.1 Need for the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP)
2.2 Benefits of CAP
2.3 CAP is a "content standard"
2.4 Development of the CAP standard
2.5 The CAP message format
2.6 Extensive Markup Language (XML) structure of a CAP message
3 Case study: Implementing a Content Standard for Alert and Notification in Sri Lanka
3.1 Background
3.2 Procedural and prioritization matters
3.3 The issue of languages
3.4 Preliminary results and discussion
4 Suggestions for immediate actions to implement the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) content standard
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Policy-makers, regulators and telecommunication operators
4.3 Sources of public warnings
4.4 Receivers of public warnings
4.5 Intermediaries for public warnings
4.6 Other infrastructure components for public warning
4.7 Other actors in disaster management
Bibliography
Annex I – Question 22/2: Utilization of ICT for disaster management, resources, and active and passive space-based...
I.1 Statement of the situation
I.2 Question for study
I.3 Expected output
I.4 Timing
I.5 Proposers
I.6 Sources of input
I.7 Target audience
I.8 Proposed methods of handling the Question
I.9 Coordination
I.10 Other relevant information
Annex II – Resolution 34 (Rev. Doha, 2006)
Annex III - Resolution 136 (Antalya, 2006)