(Continuation of Question 9/15) Motivation
The explosive growth of the Internet and standardisation of 40 and 100Gbit/s
Ethernet and other packet based traffic are the key drivers for the development
of new transport equipment and network protection and restoration related
standards. In addition, the development of the Optical Transport Network (OTN)
provides the ability to dramatically increase the bandwidth, and thus traffic
carrying capacity, of optical networks. Furthermore, the advent of the Generic
Framing Procedure (GFP), Virtual Concatenation (VC) and the Link Capacity
Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) has enabled efficient data traffic transport over
Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) and OTN. This enhanced capability has
resulted in a need for the revision of existing recommendations as well as the
development of new recommendations for data equipment such as Ethernet,
Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and other packet-based transport
equipment. Other functional enhancements such as multicast and broadcast must
also be developed. Regarding the emergence of Ethernet, it is necessary to
distinguish between Ethernet as a client signal and Ethernet as a packet
transport technology. In order to ensure these new transport networks achieve
carrier-class performance, it is essential that the necessary OAM functionality
and network management capabilities be taken into account in the development of
transport equipment Recommendations.
Responsibilities under this Question include the following areas of
standardization related to these new technologies:
- Specification of all equipment functions, supervision and protection
switching processes related to the OTN and SDH layer networks including
equipment functions related to access networks such as SDH/DSL, OTN/DSL and
Ethernet/DSL adaptation functions
- Specification of equipment functions, supervision and protection
switching processes for transport of data/packet traffic (e.g., IP, ATM,
MPLS, MPLS-TP, Ethernet, other packet-based transport technologies, Storage
Area Networks (SAN)) via transport networks
- Specification of survivability capabilities and development of a
strategy for multi-layer survivability interactions (including those where
different transport technologies are used at different layers)
- Examination of Synchronous Ethernet and the impact on synchronization
layer functions, which may differ for transport of different client layers
(e.g., IP traffic)
- Specification of fundamental transmission parameters and determination
of the effect of various transmission impairments. This includes
transmission error and availability performance objectives and allocation
methods for efficient design of digital networks and associated transmission
equipment.
- Investigation of power saving mechanisms for transport network equipment
in the wider context of ICTs (Information and Communications Technologies).
Recommendations related to transport technologies (e.g., SDH, PDH, OTN,
MPLS-TP, Ethernet and other packet-based transport technologies) used in the
access environment and not covered by other Questions of ITU-T SG15, such as
Flexible Multiplexers, are also covered by this Question. The following
major Recommendations, in force at the time of approval of this Question,
fall under its responsibility: G.705, G.781, G.783, G.798, G.806, G.841,
G.842, G.808.1, G.821, G.826, G.827, G.828, G.829, G.873.1, G.8021, G.8031,
G.8121, G.8131, G.8201, I.630 and Y.1720.
Question
What transport equipment functions must be specified to enable compatible
transport equipment in inter-office and long distance networks, including
evolution to the optical transport network?
What additional characteristics of transport equipment should be recommended
to provide enhanced survivability capabilities and a cohesive strategy for
multi-layer survivability interactions?
What characteristics should be recommended for equipment for the transport of
packet based traffic such as MPLS, MPLS-TP, Ethernet, other packet-based
transport technologies, SAN and IP?
What transmission error performance parameters and objectives need to be
recommended?
Study items to be considered include, but are not limited to:
- Enhancement and extension of transport equipment Recommendations
– for the SDH and OTN (OTN equipment in this context relates to equipment
functions and the assembly of optical components and sub-systems)
– to support the development of CBR transport over packet based networks
- Transport equipment Recommendations to provide enhanced survivability
capabilities and a cohesive strategy for multi-layer survivability
interactions. This includes revisions to Recommendations G.841, G.842,
G.808.x, I.630, G.8031/Y.1342, G.8131/Y.1382 and Y.1720. These
Recommendations cover SDH, OTN, ATM, MPLS, MPLS-TP and Ethernet layer
protection, as well as multi-layer survivability, including interactions
with protection at data/packet layers
- Ring protection mechanisms for packet transport networks including
Ethernet (G.8032/Y.1343)
- Specifications of Equipment functions necessary
– to implement an Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON)
– for the transport of packet based traffic such as MPLS-TP, Ethernet
services, and SAN
- Enhancements to SDH equipment characteristics or network protection
protocols to support paths with longer delay times, such as satellite
systems, submarine cable systems, radio relay systems or systems with
numerous regenerators.
- Enhancements required to the transport equipment Recommendations in order
to meet the needs of
– the access network
– the NGN and transport of Internet and other packet based traffic. This
includes examining the impact, if any, on synchronisation layer functions
- Clarification and resolution of technical issues in published and draft
Recommendations.
- Impact on equipment functions (such as protection switching) due to
different characteristics of satellite networks (e.g., longer delay times).
- What transport equipment functions should be specified to allow power
savings within transport networks?
Tasks
Tasks include, but are not limited to:
- Enhancement to relevant Recommendations for Ethernet (as a client or
as a server) networks to accommodate 100Gbit/s Ethernet services
- Complete Recommendation G.808.2 (ex G.gps-2)
- Complete Recommendation G. 873.2 (ex G.otnprot-2)
- Enhancements to OTN protection mechanisms, for example nested and M:N ODUk
SNC
- Revisions to Recommendation G.798
- To maintain and update, as necessary, the error performance
recommendations G.821, G.826, G.827, G.828, G.829 and G.8201
- Enhancements to the Recommendation for equipment for Ethernet (as a client
or as a server) services (G.8021/Y.1341)
- Enhancement and improvement of Recommendation on characteristics of
packet-based transport network equipment functional blocks
- Enhancement to Recommendations for Ethernet (as a client or as a server)
linear protection switching (G.8031/Y.1342)
- Enhancement to Recommendations for other survivability techniques
including per packet priority-based protection switching for packet based
transport networks
- Development of ring protection mechanisms for Ethernet (as a client or as
a server) (G.8032/Y.1344)
- Enhancement and improvement of linear and ring protection switching
Recommendations
- Clarification of relationships between protection switching and
restoration technologies
- Clarification of relationships between survivability function of a
packet-based transport and survivability function in other layers or other
transport technologies (e.g., SDH, OTN, etc.)
- Enhancement to relevant Recommendations to include broadcast and multicast
functionality
- Enhancement to relevant Recommendations to include partial protection
switching in rooted multipoint service (RMPS)
- Maintain and update of MSR
- Develop additional Recommendations from progress on the above study items.
- Develop a revised version of Recommendation G.8121/Y.1381 "Characteristics
of Transport MPLS (T-MPLS) equipment functional blocks" and Recommendation
G.8131/Y.1382 “Linear protection switching for Transport MPLS (T-MPLS)
networks” to align with the MPLS-TP architecture and include the appropriate
normative references to the MPLS-TP RFCs that are being developed to address
the requirements of the transport network. Update the title to replace T-MPLS
with MPLS-TP to reflect the new contents.
NOTE: An up-to-date status of work under this Question is contained in the
SG15 Work Programme at http://1f8a81b9b0707b63-19211.webchannel-proxy.scarabresearch.com/ITU-T/workprog
Relationships
Recommendations:
- G.707, G.709, G.784, G.825, G.957, G.959.1, G.7710, G.693, G.694,
G.698, G.8080, G.8010, G.8110, G.8110.1, G.8251, G.8261, G.8262, G.8264,
G.993.x, Y.2601 and Y.2611
Questions:
- Q3/15, Q4/15, Q6/15, Q10/15, Q11/15, Q12/15, Q13/15, Q14/15, and
15/15.
Study Groups:
- ITU-T SG2 responsible for telecommunication management
- ITU-T SG13 responsible for NGN aspects
- ITU-R SG9 responsible for Radio-relay systems
- ITU-T SG12 responsible for Ethernet and MPLS error performance
Standardization bodies, forums and consortia:
- IETF working groups related to MPLS-TP and MPLS-TP Equipment and
protectiom
- MEF on Ethernet Equipment
- ATIS OPTXS on SONET/SDH
- IEEE 802.1, 802.3 on Ethernet Equipment
- IEEE 802.17 on Ethernet Ring protection
- IP/MPLS Forum
|